tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773759989225356372.post4389047103935515916..comments2024-03-27T19:24:05.285-05:00Comments on Stupefying Stories Magazine: Lights, Camera, Action!~brbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10845253722980029012noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773759989225356372.post-88944236729439599202021-02-26T11:14:27.053-06:002021-02-26T11:14:27.053-06:00A Sound of Thunder is worse than Damnation Alley. ...A Sound of Thunder is worse than Damnation Alley. The movie massacred Zelazny's book for no real reason, but it still ended up being entertaining with a likable cast. George Peppard and Jan Michael Vincent rose above the material. Thunder, on the other hand, had a mediocre cast and zero entertainment value.Pete Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14512590488080103661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773759989225356372.post-74061981467733138152021-02-26T09:10:19.138-06:002021-02-26T09:10:19.138-06:00How can you get any worse than that? Easily. Get B...How can you get any worse than that? Easily. Get Barry Longyear talking about what they did to <i>Enemy Mine</i> sometime. ~brbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10845253722980029012noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773759989225356372.post-82830793272567802072021-02-26T08:13:55.511-06:002021-02-26T08:13:55.511-06:00While I agree A Sound of Thunder is a horrible ada...While I agree <i>A Sound of Thunder</i> is a horrible adaptation of Bradbury's brilliant short story, are you sure it's worse than 1977's <i>Damnation Alley</i>? While Zelazny's book aged horribly in the eight years between its release and the movie's release, the movie abandoned everything about the novel except for the vehicle and the post-apocalyptic setting, and then added man-eating cockroaches. I mean, how can you get any worse than that?Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05813572493834867342noreply@blogger.com