Saturday, January 4, 2025

Ask Dr. Cyberpunk: with your host, Bruce Bethke • only four weeks left!


REMINDER: this is the last call for FAQ questions. If you have a question you’ve always wanted to ask me about my story, “Cyberpunk,” or the writing thereof, send it to brucebethke.cybrpnk@gmail.com. Given that we want to have Cyberpunk and Cyberpunk Revisited ready to release in March 2025, I have set a hard deadline of Saturday, February 1st, 2025. After that date, any and all questions about “Cyberpunk” will receive the same reply: “Buy the book.”

We’re planning to have the e-book uploaded and ready for pre-orders by mid-February. We’re also talking about doing a special limited-edition hardcover, most likely to be signed and serialized, but those plans are still in flux. 

In the meantime, some new questions have come in.  

Q: What do you think of George Alec Effinger’s contribution to Cyber stuff? He’s the one we discovered first, and my wife is a real fan. She was saddened by his death, but she felt his writing suggested a life on the edge.

A: George was a friend. Not the best of friends, as concomitant with living life on the edge he was often broke and in need of help, but I counted him as a friend.

A year or so before he died he surprised me by phoning one day, to tell me he had three novels under contract and his publisher had asked him to find a co-author, just in case his health problems got worse and he couldn’t finish the books. He asked if I was interested.

I was, and we tried to work together for a while, but by then his medical problems had progressed to the point where he had trouble articulating what he was thinking, or even remembering what he’d said from one day to the next. Eventually I had to give up and back out of the project. It was unworkable.

What do I think of his contribution? I thought When Gravity Fails was brilliant, and was always a little sad that I never thought to ask him to sign my hardcover copy. For that matter I thought What Entropy Means to Me was brilliant, too, when I first read it, but the one book I most regret not asking him to sign was my hardcover copy of Maureen Birnbaum, Barbarian Swordsperson.

Why that book? Because it made me laugh.

Q: Wow. I just read your December 30 post, but I feel like I’m missing something. Bottom-line it for me.

A: The bottom line is that my four-book deal with Jim Baen just about destroyed my fiction writing career. Before I signed those contracts, I was a promising young writer who was selling every short story he finished and already had one novel out. The time I spent as editor of the share-cropped anthology series would have been much better spent writing and selling more of my own stories, and the Cyberpunk novel fiasco prevented my selling any novel-length fiction to anyone for five years. By the time I finally was able to buy my freedom from that contract—and it cost me thousands to do so—the two markets I’d been selling most of my short fiction to, Amazing and Aboriginal, were coughing blood, and while I had recovered the rights to the Cyberpunk novel, every agent and editor I spoke with assured me there was no point in trying to sell it anymore, as the market had spoken with Godlike finality, and cyberpunk was dead. 
Cyberpunk is dead, you say? Okay, then hand me a wooden stake and a mallet, and let’s make sure. Which is how I came to write Headcrash.

Q: Great story! The game had a good story line, but was more for high end specs consoles and pc!

A: Um, thanks, but I had absolutely nothing to do with Cyberpunk, the video game, Cyberpunk, the role-playing game, Cyberpunk, the comic book, Cyberpunk, the TV series, Cyberpunk, the lunchbox, Cyberpunk, the flame-thrower… 

People seem to imagine that being the guy who wrote “Cyberpunk” has made me rich and famous. It made me famous, all right, but that’s where it ends. Aside from the original short story sale in 1982, and the very few publishers who have had the decency to pay me for reprint rights rather than simply bootlegging the story, I have never made another dime off “Cyberpunk.”
I’ve had a lot of near misses. In the early 1990s, some gaming company approached me wanting to buy the rights to use “Cyberpunk” for a role-playing game. I was interested at first, until it became clear that they didn’t actually want to use my story or have me be involved in any way, they just wanted to own the name, so as to establish standing in order to sue the makers of the Cyberpunk: 2020 game.
This continues to this day. People approach me claiming they want to buy the rights to adapt “Cyberpunk” for stage, screen, gaming, or other purposes (and the less said about the folks who wanted to do Cyberpunk: The Musical, the better), but invariably, they don’t want my ideas and they don’t want me involved, they just want to own the name, in hopes that it will give them leverage over someone else. Right before the pandemic I was being aggressively courted by a company that claimed they wanted to option “Cyberpunk” and turn it into a direct-to-streaming TV series—
But once again, it turned out they didn’t really want to use my story or have me involved in any way, they just wanted to establish standing, so that the makers of the Cyberpunk: 2077 TV series would pay them to shut up and go away.
Sigh.
For the record, the Rebel Moon movies on Netflix have nothing to do with my 1996 novel of the same name, either; and no, we never received even a token “shut up and go away” payment.

§

REMINDER: this is the last call for FAQ questions. If you have a question you’ve always wanted to ask me about my story, “Cyberpunk,” or the writing thereof, send it to brucebethke.cybrpnk@gmail.com. Given that we want to have Cyberpunk and Cyberpunk Revisited ready to release in March 2025, I have set a hard deadline of Saturday, February 1st, 2025. After that date, any and all questions about “Cyberpunk” will receive the same reply: “Buy the book.”

And while you’re waiting for it, considering buying some other books, too, okay? At least, take a look at SS#23, and maybe read “Eddie’s Upgrade,” by Kevin Stadt. If you like cyberpunk, you’ll love that story. 

Friday, January 3, 2025

TOP 10: The Rest of the Best of 2024 (Part 2)


 ...continued from Part 1...

As we delve deeper into the site metrics the answers become increasingly more cryptic, and we begin to suspect we may as well be consulting a Magic 8 Ball as Google site analytics. Our list of the Top 15 most-read stories published in 2024 is pretty solid, both in terms of gross readership and ranking, but once we get past 15, we begin to see really contradictory results depending on which report we view. Assigning relative rankings to stories therefore becomes difficult, and sometimes the difference in ranking between one story and the next is a matter of a single tick on the reader counter. We suspect there is some interaction between the site analytics and Google’s use of cookies, but what that interaction may be is undocumented and therefore remains a mystery.

For example, on one report Made in DNA’s 2023 story, “The Shrine Keeper,” shows up prominently in the 2024 Top 20, while on other reports, it doesn’t show up at all. Even though the story was published in 2023, it continued to rack up a sizable number of page reads throughout 2024—until September, when we published “Fathom,” also by Made in DNA, and then readership of “The Shrine Keeper” tapered off. 

For another example, “Pink Marble,” by Zoe Kaplan, lands in the Top 20 on most reports, but we can’t tell if those are actual readers or something else, because the story has also become a spam comment magnet. In case you’ve wondered, we do read and moderate all comments on this site, and unless someone objects, we will continue to block and delete all comments that are actually advertisements, even if they are for really nice companies that only want to offer you the best deals on imported Mediterranean marble, limestone, and granite tiles and paving blocks.

Comment moderation is an issue for us, but it’s an erratic one. E.g., at one time we actually had to unpublish and hide “King of Chrome,” by Travis Burnham, because it was drawing thousands of spam comments. We did eventually republish the story, once the spambot activity died down, but this is the reason why strict comment moderation remains in effect on all older posts and stories.

With all those caveats in place, here is our list of the 2024 Honorable Mentions: those stories that drew a lot of readers, but not enough to place in the Top 15. We won’t assign relative rankings to these stories, either because of ambiguity in the site metrics or because the difference between one story and the next is so slim that your reading one now and not another would change the results. 

Enjoy!

~brb



“The Six Stages of Grief,” by Christopher Degni


“The First Seed on Mars,” by Logan Thrasher Collins


“The Fine Art of Spellweaving,” by Catherine Tavares


“Wielder of Wit,” by Ian Li


“Then Beggars Would Ride,” by Fred Waiss


“Arrivals at Hope Station
Have Been Indefinitely Postponed,”
by Warren Benedetto


“Today in London History,” by Judith Field


“Familial Fragments,” by Arnoldo Millán Zubia


“The Offs,” by Ted Macaluso


“The Captain’s Mistake,” by Kai Holmwood


“Dust Bunnies,” by Vaughan Stanger


“Getting Sponsored,” by Eric Fomley


Thursday, January 2, 2025

TOP 10: The Rest of the Best of 2024 (Part 1)

...continued from TOP 10: The Best of 2024...

You’d think it would be easy to put together a ranked list of the most-read stories we published in 2024. It wasn’t. The administrative back-end to this site provides us with a wealth of data and traffic metrics, but sometimes the results it reports are contradictory.

We’re pretty confident of yesterday’s Top 10 list: the readership stats and rankings for the top stories we published last year are pretty clear, and those ten stories always come out on the top of the heap, no matter which report we run.

The further we delve into the site metrics, though, the murkier and more contradictory the data becomes, and the more the idea of assigning rankings to stories begins to seem arbitrary. Therefore, today we present the five stories that almost made it onto the Top 10 list, with relative rankings in which we have a pretty high degree of confidence.


#11. “Chasing the Moon,” by Karin Terebessy


#12. “Broken,” by Karin Terebessy


#13. “Must Have Been Moonglow,” by Jeanne Van Slyke


#14. “The Big Bad,” by Richard J. Dowling


#15. “You,” by Conrad Gardner


TOMORROW: The Honorable Mentions!

Wednesday, January 1, 2025