Thursday, January 16, 2025

WRITING ADVICE: Analyzing What Went Into EMERALD OF EARTH *** THIS IS LONG. I KNOW. I ASK YOU TO READ IT...***

THIS IS A LONG PIECE...SO MOVE ON IF IT'S TOO MUCH!


In September of 2007, I started a blog with a bit of writing advice. A little over a year later, I discovered how little I knew about writing after hearing children’s writer, Lin Oliver speak at a convention hosted by the Minnesota Society of Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators. Since then, I have shared (with their permission) and applied the writing wisdom of Lin Oliver, Jack McDevitt, Nathan Bransford, Mike Duran, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, SL Veihl, Bruce Bethke, and Julie Czerneda. Together they write in genres broad and deep, and have acted as agents, editors, publishers, columnists, and teachers. Since then, I figured I’d finally learned enough been published enough times that I can share some of the things I did RIGHT. Here's a few of those things.

While I don’t write full-time, nor do I make enough money with my writing to live off of it, though someone pays for and publishes ten percent of what I write. When I started this blog, that was NOT true, so I may have reached a point where my own advice is reasonably good. We shall see!

As my kids and wife will attest, I started EMERALD OF EARTH twenty-one years ago in response to the wave of dystopian science fiction aimed at young adults. Of COURSE there has always been "dark" science fiction -- HG Wells' WAR OF THE WORLDS springs to mind!

In fact, I was really and truly hooked on science fiction by the grim future in John Christopher’s THE WHITE MOUNTAINS books. Lois Lowry’s THE GIVER came when I was in high school, and Margaret Atwood’s THE HANDMAID’S TALE rose to the top NOT as teen lit, but as subversive science fiction – not for teens, but for adults who were looking for MORE after rereading the HARRY POTTER fantasies a dozen times.

Then came the deluge of the “book-to-movie” best sellers like THE HUNGER GAMES and MAZE RUNNER following on the heels of what I think of as “teen carnage” novels where, like the Harry Potter series after GOBLET OF FIRE with teens slaughtering each other and being slaughtered by evil adults became normal for YA fiction. Because while they were ostensibly for teens and YA, adults were reading them in DROVES.

There’s been some serious research on this as well: “Why Do Adults Read Young Adult Novels?" Monica Hay, Fellow at Portland State University0 Department of English wrote “Book industries and trade, Publishers and publishing, Young adult literature” (from the abstract): “Young adult books are widely read by adults. Through interviews with publishing professionals and a survey of 2,139 participants, several reasons were discovered regarding why adults read young adult literature.

“In the research, the most common reasons were the influence of Harry Potter and Twilight, the relatability for millennials, the social media presence of YA online, and the success of women writers in the category. Survey participants had more to add. The survey themes were nostalgia, ‘less pretentious,’ ‘faster reads,’ diversity, escapism, ‘less graphic,’ and perhaps most importantly, hopeful.”

So I started to look at a DIFFERENT future than the doom-and-gloom presented by some of the books that adults and kids appeared to be reading.

What if Humanity launched into a serious exploration of the Solar System and it wasn’t just with soldiers and old people? What if the future included young people? The ones would would spend a long time living in space?

I was compelled to give my novel a title that would draw in YA readers expecting carnage in their reading. I changed it to EMERALD OF EARTH: HEIRS OF THE SHATTERED SPHERES, with the intent of writing a series. And I WILL if sales of the first book go well. came out in March 2024, and while sales haven’t been stellar, I’m doing things like this to boost the signal.

It takes place in a future where Humans have launched into an exploration of the Solar System thoroughly and methodically. Using a hollowed out asteroid called the SOLAR EXPLORER (SOLAREX for short!) as a base, they will spend a year at each planet, probing, landing on, collecting samples, data, and answering questions without having to worry about shipping tiny amounts of material “home” to be analyzed by experts. The experts were right there.

But at one point, I thought EMERALD OF EARTH was boring and would have had a hard time finding advocacy among the more exciting titles (except THE GIVER; that was hardly self-explanatory, nor was THE HANDMAID’S TALE or even Butler’s 1979 masterpiece, KINDRED). Flashy titles had replaced subtle, so I had to do the same.

I came up with EARTH ATTACKED! Ugh. Then I tried LEGACY OF THE WOUNDED WORLDS…Worser and worser!

Finally, I resorted to something I’d never done: I sat down with a thesaurus and the “Legacy” title and found synonyms for all of the words and wrote them on slips of paper. Then I went to a table and began to rearrange them, speaking them out loud countless times until I found one title that held up under the stress of repetition.

HEIRS OF THE SHATTERED SPHERES. Instead of a single book, though, I suddenly had an idea for a SERIES.

Emerald’s story would be its own story, separate from eleven others but intertwined with them because they all live aboard the hollowed out asteroid SOLAR EXPLORER.

Emerald’s story would be the first of a much, much larger story. I wouldn’t have her defeating Inamma in one fell swoop. She needed to fight for her existence, so I made Inamma smarter than it had been before and more subtle.

Even more though, I needed Emerald to have “kid problems”. She needed to deal with issues every kid on Earth needed to deal with. So I gave her friend problems. She wanted them but couldn’t seem to keep them. But what began as a nebulous, “I can’t get friends”, needed a firmer foundation.

As a guidance counselor, I’d started working closely with several autistic students and had come to understand them just a tiny bit. The ones I dealt with were brilliant – but challenged by the world they lived in. I realized that my growing understanding of these young people might be an aspect of Emerald that I hadn’t really developed.

Once I started to understand Emerald, other things fell into place – things like answering the question: “What do teenagers DO on a spacecraft called SOLAREX, committed to a twelve year mission?” So I had to give them “school in space”. But NOT a clone of “school on Earth”, cloned from a form that came from England with American colonists in the 18th Century.

To tell you the truth, when it comes to school for teens in space, SF writers have TOTALLY lacked imagination!

Star Trek: The Next Generation and ST:DS9 have children and teens going to school and SITTING IN DESKS!!! They don’t even go to a holographic “virtual school” that is identical to what we had during the pandemic as in Michael’s Burstein’s award-winning short story, “Teleabsence”. Yet we’ve fled BACK to kids with butts in seats in schools…because we’ve got this weird idea that PARENTS are incapable of educating their kids and ONLY TRAINED TEACHER can do the job.

As a teacher for 41 years: during which time I taught science 6th grade general science, 7th grade life science, eighth grade Earth science, 9th grade physical science, 10th grade biology, 11th grade chemistry, and 12th grade physics, as well as designing and teaching TWO Astronomy classes – as well as writing classes for gifted and talented young people between 4th and 10th grade – I can tell you that THE BEST TEACHERS ARE PARENTS.

(I’m one of those, too…and a grandparent.)

For science fiction writers, you have Orson Scott Card training children to just “be soldiers” in ENDER’S GAME books. Why is that? I think the Science Fiction world has treated the future of education as if we’d already reached the PINNACLE of “educational technology” here in 21st Century America…I don’t even see SF attempting to include educational theory and practice from other cultures! A quick Google search reveals only that there are lots of articles on how to use SF to teach about science or inspire girls to be scientists. This list / is a good start, but hardly complete – at least I hope it’s not complete.

At any rate, to create an educational system that made sense, I drew from my own experience. One thing I knew for certain was that I didn’t want my teens – and there are 130+ of them on SOLAR EXPLORER – just “going to school” and then “hanging out”.

As important as that activity is, and knowing that I’m not speaking tongue-in-cheek – these young people are not only going to be in space for twelve years, they are going to mature into adults who will in their own time take their places in the operation of the ship. Some will be “promoted” to apprenticeships or leadership positions; some will become menial laborers. Some perhaps will become philosophers, others still recorders, writers, and artisans.

But how do they get there? NOT ONLY just “hanging out” on their cellphones and on social media all the time! That is PART of their education – social and educational media are adjuncts to formal education – but THEY have to be adjuncts of PARENTAL education efforts as well.

Honestly? This society has abdicated our wisdom by waving our kids in the general direction of “teachers”. THAT’S A BAD THING. I’m telling you here that not ONLY have I known absolutely shitty teachers; I’ve known EVIL teachers. You know what else? There are times in my life that I’ve been a shitty teacher myself.

Education in classical literature, mathematics, social studies (including history as well as the social experiment they live in!), physical education, science (duh!), art, and practical skills like programming, global languages, welding, recycling technologies, particle physics, gravitational manipulation technologies, and mass communication and journalism – how do you cover all of these things without sitting the fat butts of these kids down? And we need to start teaching our kids MANNERS – not sloppy adult manners, but a FOUNDATION of manners that EVERY SINGLE SOCIETY ON EARTH HAS.

In my novel, SOLAREX is a tiny, closed society. You might consider it a microscopic section of countries like “Andorra, Luxembourg, Greenland, Norway, Liechtenstein” where “literacy reaches virtually 100 percent.” Surveillance is practically universal (though I touch on the fact that it’s NOT!), so teens will only get into minimal trouble in the ways that they do. As well, there’s an “illicit” athletic outlet (pryzhok) as well as plenty of other things to do. Education is experiential as well as academic. They work on Intensive Training Teams as well as receive homework assignments in the “traditional subjects” we expect teens to study. They also receive tangible rewards as a result of inter-Team competition in both their vocational training and academics. And YES, “‘Vacation days, Leisure Study days and tours, credit chits to buy food at the alternate restaurants and hang outs, mostly.’”

Instructors design educational pathways for students – “He was willing to admit that he’d been a master query marker guide at one time. He’d figure out what someone needed to know then lead them there. After the suicides, he’d adjudged himself a stupid query marker guru, quit, and fled.”

I’m trying to explore ways that we might educate our young people. It SEEMS sometimes like it’s a lonely business, educating young minds. It SHOULD NOT BE. It needs to be EVERYONE’S job…

And it’s no longer seen that way. And from MY perspective, that is ALSO the main reason the Pandemic Distance Education hit our kids so hard…NOT ALL OF THEM THEM…but lots of them.

I put forward community effort on SOLAR EXPLORER as a model for us to return to – and then allow communities to ADAPT TO THEIR KIDS…Comments anyone?

LINKS: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/eng_bookpubpaper/35/; http://sf.hackeducation.com; http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-highest-literacy-rates-in-the-world.html;
IMAGE: https://www.amazon.com/Emerald-Earth-Heirs-Shattered-Spheres/dp/1958333166/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&dib_tag=se&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.PMZul37u_A-yH1LfdxoJ_4iBsTIPAa-dcKcAYmv6WDJZJACtYOnZ8toIWHepGLzwDgcwPZa5ySaFTyXxDHB6x85EysrwG8c_Fs_6IxTzQ6L3naz7ZGJ4nJL1UMFwPAR6HPceUFI79nNdKI79TOzkCzNlUM0Fslu7enXSYjoi5shC0EWph5S5EukqRan_LFpafkgVdrt5AriNaxk4v6AWYTRuDaSk_91uYI1tD4ZiQ3s.RSgRAQeOVuHkoEpV9T_vci5uBYmbWChcdjg1uzqkqpw&qid=1713588732&sr=1-1

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

TOP 10: Special Edition! The Pete Wood Challenge


Following up on last week’s TOP 10 Stories of 2024 posts (The Best of 2024, The Rest of the Best (Part 1), and The Rest of the Best (Part 2), Pete Wood asked me to run another report breaking out the most-read Pete Wood Challenge stories of 2024. I’ll have more to say about this tomorrow, but for today, here you go. According to the readership metrics, these are the top Pete Wood Challenge Stories we published in 2024.

THE TOP 10 

#1. “Wielder of Wit,” by Ian Li

 

#2. “The Offs,” by Ted Macaluso

 

#3. “In the Line of Duty,” by Gustavo Bondoni

 

#4. “The Triennial Igneous Tri-Partite Competition,” by Pauline Barmby

 

#5. “A Change of Management,” by S. R. Kriger

 

#6. “Like Clockwork,” by Yelena Crane

 

#7. “The Potato Singer,” by Ian Li

 

#8. “Hosting a Tempest,” by Ian Li

 

#9. (Tie) “Astronaut Countdown,” by Brandon Case

 

#9. (Tie) “Punch Flavored Punch,” by Yelena Crane

 

#10. (Tie) When the Woman in the Forest Says,
“Please, You Must Help,”
by Elis Montgomery

 

#10. (Tie) “Summit, in Memory,” by Ian Li

  

HONORABLE MENTIONS

In addition, these stories ranked high in the readership numbers, but not quite high enough to break into the TOP 10.

#1. “Reflections on Carnival-by-the-Sea,” by Christopher Degni

 

#2. “The Sirens’ Salvation,” by Kimberly Ann Smiley

 

#3. “Forgetting on Draft,” by Elis Montgomery

 

#4. “Dangerouser and Dangerouser,” by Sophie Sparrow

 

#5. (Tie) “Tonight, We Embrace the Dark,” by Gideon P. Smith

 

#5. (Tie) “To Hell and Back,” by Kai Delmas

 

Aside from, “You need to publish more Ian Li stories!” what do these numbers mean? We’ll talk about that tomorrow, in the next installment of The Never-ending FAQ.

Saturday, January 4, 2025

Ask Dr. Cyberpunk: with your host, Bruce Bethke • only four weeks left!


REMINDER: this is the last call for FAQ questions. If you have a question you’ve always wanted to ask me about my story, “Cyberpunk,” or the writing thereof, send it to brucebethke.cybrpnk@gmail.com. Given that we want to have Cyberpunk and Cyberpunk Revisited ready to release in March 2025, I have set a hard deadline of Saturday, February 1st, 2025. After that date, any and all questions about “Cyberpunk” will receive the same reply: “Buy the book.”

We’re planning to have the e-book uploaded and ready for pre-orders by mid-February. We’re also talking about doing a special limited-edition hardcover, most likely to be signed and serialized, but those plans are still in flux. 

In the meantime, some new questions have come in.  

Q: What do you think of George Alec Effinger’s contribution to Cyber stuff? He’s the one we discovered first, and my wife is a real fan. She was saddened by his death, but she felt his writing suggested a life on the edge.

A: George was a friend. Not the best of friends, as concomitant with living life on the edge he was often broke and in need of help, but I counted him as a friend.

A year or so before he died he surprised me by phoning one day, to tell me he had three novels under contract and his publisher had asked him to find a co-author, just in case his health problems got worse and he couldn’t finish the books. He asked if I was interested.

I was, and we tried to work together for a while, but by then his medical problems had progressed to the point where he had trouble articulating what he was thinking, or even remembering what he’d said from one day to the next. Eventually I had to give up and back out of the project. It was unworkable.

What do I think of his contribution? I thought When Gravity Fails was brilliant, and was always a little sad that I never thought to ask him to sign my hardcover copy. For that matter I thought What Entropy Means to Me was brilliant, too, when I first read it, but the one book I most regret not asking him to sign was my hardcover copy of Maureen Birnbaum, Barbarian Swordsperson.

Why that book? Because it made me laugh.

Q: Wow. I just read your December 30 post, but I feel like I’m missing something. Bottom-line it for me.

A: The bottom line is that my four-book deal with Jim Baen just about destroyed my fiction writing career. Before I signed those contracts, I was a promising young writer who was selling every short story he finished and already had one novel out. The time I spent as editor of the share-cropped anthology series would have been much better spent writing and selling more of my own stories, and the Cyberpunk novel fiasco prevented my selling any novel-length fiction to anyone for five years. By the time I finally was able to buy my freedom from that contract—and it cost me thousands to do so—the two SF markets I’d been selling most of my short fiction to, Amazing and Aboriginal, were coughing blood, and while I had recovered the rights to my Cyberpunk novel, every agent and editor I spoke with assured me there was no point in my continuing to try to sell it any longer. The market had spoken with Godlike finality. Cyberpunk was dead.
Cyberpunk is dead, you say? Okay, then hand me a wooden stake and a mallet, and let’s make sure. Which is how I came to write Headcrash.

 

Q: Great story! The game had a good story line, but was more for high end specs consoles and pc!

A: Um, thanks, but I had absolutely nothing to do with Cyberpunk, the video game, Cyberpunk, the role-playing game, Cyberpunk, the comic book, Cyberpunk, the TV series, Cyberpunk, the lunchbox, Cyberpunk, the flame-thrower… 

People seem to imagine that being the guy who wrote “Cyberpunk” has made me rich and famous. It made me famous, all right, but that’s where it ends. Aside from the original short story sale in 1982, and the very few publishers who have had the decency to pay me for reprint rights rather than simply bootlegging the story, I have never made another dime off “Cyberpunk.”
I’ve had a lot of near misses. In the early 1990s, some gaming company approached me wanting to buy the rights to use “Cyberpunk” for a role-playing game. I was interested at first, until it became clear that they didn’t actually want to use my story or have me be involved in any way, they just wanted to own the name, so as to establish standing in order to sue the makers of the Cyberpunk: 2020 game.
This continues to this day. People approach me claiming they want to buy the rights to adapt “Cyberpunk” for stage, screen, gaming, or other purposes (and the less said about the folks who wanted to do Cyberpunk: The Musical, the better), but invariably, they don’t want my ideas and they don’t want me involved, they just want to own the name, in hopes that it will give them leverage over someone else. Right before the pandemic I was being aggressively courted by a company that claimed they wanted to option “Cyberpunk” and turn it into a direct-to-streaming TV series—
But once again, it turned out they didn’t really want to use my story or have me involved in any way, they just wanted to establish standing, so that the makers of the Cyberpunk: 2077 TV series would pay them to shut up and go away.
Sigh.
For the record, the Rebel Moon movies on Netflix have nothing to do with my 1996 novel of the same name, either; and no, we never received even a token “shut up and go away” payment.

§

REMINDER: this is the last call for FAQ questions. If you have a question you’ve always wanted to ask me about my story, “Cyberpunk,” or the writing thereof, send it to brucebethke.cybrpnk@gmail.com. Given that we want to have Cyberpunk and Cyberpunk Revisited ready to release in March 2025, I have set a hard deadline of Saturday, February 1st, 2025. After that date, any and all questions about “Cyberpunk” will receive the same reply: “Buy the book.”

And while you’re waiting for it, considering buying some other books, too, okay? At least, take a look at SS#23, and maybe read “Eddie’s Upgrade,” by Kevin Stadt. If you like cyberpunk, you’ll love that story. 

Friday, January 3, 2025

TOP 10: The Rest of the Best of 2024 (Part 2)


 ...continued from Part 1...

As we delve deeper into the site metrics the answers become increasingly cryptic, and we begin to suspect we may as well be consulting a Magic 8 Ball as Google site analytics. Our list of the Top 15 most-read stories published in 2024 is pretty solid, both in terms of gross readership and ranking, but once we get past 15, we begin to see really contradictory results depending on which report we view. Assigning relative rankings to stories therefore becomes difficult, and sometimes the difference in ranking between one story and the next is a matter of a single tick on the reader counter. We suspect there is some interaction between the site analytics and Google’s use of cookies, but what that interaction may be is undocumented, and therefore remains a mystery.

For example, on one report Made in DNA’s 2023 story, “The Shrine Keeper,” shows up prominently in the 2024 Top 20, while on other reports, it doesn’t show up at all. Even though the story was published in 2023, it continued to rack up a sizable number of page reads throughout 2024—until September, when we published “Fathom,” also by Made in DNA, and then readership of “The Shrine Keeper” tapered off. 

For another example, “Pink Marble,” by Zoe Kaplan, lands in the Top 20 on most reports, but we can’t tell if those are actual readers or something else, because the story has also become a spam comment magnet. In case you’ve wondered, we do read and moderate all comments on this site, and unless someone objects, we will continue to block and delete all comments that are actually advertisements, even if they are for really nice companies that only want to offer you the best deals on imported Mediterranean marble, limestone, and granite tiles and paving blocks.

Comment moderation is an issue for us, but it’s an erratic one. E.g., at one time we actually had to unpublish and hide “King of Chrome,” by Travis Burnham, because it was drawing thousands of spam comments. We did eventually republish the story, once the spambot activity died down, but this is the reason why strict comment moderation remains in effect on all older posts and stories.

With all those caveats in place, here is our list of the 2024 Honorable Mentions: those stories that drew a lot of readers, but not enough to place in the Top 15. We won’t assign relative rankings to these stories, either because of ambiguity in the site metrics or because the difference between one story and the next is so slim that your reading one now and not another would change the results. 

Enjoy!

~brb



“The Six Stages of Grief,” by Christopher Degni


“The First Seed on Mars,” by Logan Thrasher Collins


“The Fine Art of Spellweaving,” by Catherine Tavares


“Wielder of Wit,” by Ian Li


“Then Beggars Would Ride,” by Fred Waiss


“Arrivals at Hope Station
Have Been Indefinitely Postponed,”
by Warren Benedetto


“Today in London History,” by Judith Field


“Familial Fragments,” by Arnoldo Millán Zubia


“The Offs,” by Ted Macaluso


“The Captain’s Mistake,” by Kai Holmwood


“Dust Bunnies,” by Vaughan Stanger


“Getting Sponsored,” by Eric Fomley


Thursday, January 2, 2025

TOP 10: The Rest of the Best of 2024 (Part 1)

...continued from TOP 10: The Best of 2024...

You’d think it would be easy to put together a ranked list of the most-read stories we published in 2024. It wasn’t. The administrative back-end to this site provides us with a wealth of data and traffic metrics, but sometimes the results it reports are contradictory.

We’re pretty confident of yesterday’s Top 10 list: the readership stats and rankings for the top stories we published last year are pretty clear, and those ten stories always come out on the top of the heap, no matter which report we run.

The further we delve into the site metrics, though, the murkier and more contradictory the data becomes, and the more the idea of assigning rankings to stories begins to seem arbitrary. Therefore, today we present the five stories that almost made it onto the Top 10 list, with relative rankings in which we have a pretty high degree of confidence.


#11. “Chasing the Moon,” by Karin Terebessy


#12. “Broken,” by Karin Terebessy


#13. “Must Have Been Moonglow,” by Jeanne Van Slyke


#14. “The Big Bad,” by Richard J. Dowling


#15. “You,” by Conrad Gardner


TOMORROW: The Honorable Mentions!

Wednesday, January 1, 2025